Pathways' Pick of the Week: Another Record NTAP Haul is Coming

article image
ARTICLE SUMMARY:

The upswing for Medicare New Technology Add-On Payments continues. Excerpted from Pathways’ Picks April 16: New Tech Payments, China Classifications, Notified Body Positions, and More.

CMS is primed to award New Technology Add-on Payments to a record number of medical devices for the third year running. The Medicare agency identified 15 devices that are virtually assured to qualify for the bonus reimbursement starting October 1 in its FY 2026 hospital inpatient payment proposed rule published April 1. CMS identified another two devices that are likely to qualify but need to provide additional information about cost calculations and another nine that will receive the payment if they secure FDA authorization by May 1. If 26 devices are awarded NTAPs when CMS issues its final rule in the summer, it would more than double the previous record for new NTAPs, set last year, awarded since the program launched in 2001. All of these are FDA Breakthrough Devices seeking the add-on payments via a special route that doesn’t require manufacturers to prove “substantial clinical improvement.” An additional three non-Breakthrough devices are pursuing FY 2026 NTAPs via the traditional route, but they have more to prove regarding clinical impact. Under the NTAP program, hospitals receive an extra, targeted reimbursement to cover the costs of new technologies for two to three years while CMS works out the proper long-term payment policy for the products. It can serve as a useful market on-ramp for new devices, but historically, in industry’s view, CMS has been overly cautious in how it awards the payments. The agency also disclosed plans in the FY 2026 proposed rule to continue add-on payments for 14 devices started receiving NTAPs in prior years.

Continue reading Pathways’ Picks here.
×



Articles from David Filmore:

Regulatory & Reimbursement

Q&A: European Medicines AND Medical Devices Agency? Clinicians Push for More Coordination in MDR/IVDR

European clinical groups say the MDR and IVDR lack a methodological framework to appropriately align clinical expectations with different device types. Establishing these principles under the leadership of the European Medicines Agency should be a top priority of oncoming reforms, according to a consortium of clinical societies. Tom Melvin, a professor, regulatory expert, and clinical advisor to the EU, spoke to Market Pathways about the proposal, which he helped coordinate.

Read Article