Pathways' Pick of the Week: Final FDA Guidance on PCCPs for AI

article image
ARTICLE SUMMARY:

FDA issues final guidance on predetermined change control plans for AI. Excerpted from Pathways’ Picks December 4: Action Packed in the EU, FDA AI Guide, and Global Picks.

FDA expanded the scope of its guidance on pursuing predetermined change control plans (PCCPs) for AI-enabled device software functions in a final version published this week. The highly anticipated document comes about a year-and-a-half after a draft version that addressed PCCPs for machine learning-enabled devices, a subset of AI software. The final guidance is “intended to be broadly applicable to all AI-enabled devices,” FDA states, although most PCCPs the agency has reviewed up until now incorporate machine learning. PCCPs are a means for manufacturers to gain FDA authorization for planned modifications, and steps to validate the modifications, in advance to avoid needing to go back to the agency with a new submission. FDA has so far authorized more than 40 PCCPs, many targeting planned algorithm-related updates to AI devices. The final guidance provides more details about the types of submissions that can include a PCCP—including original PMAs, most PMA supplement types, traditional and abbreviated 510(k)s, and De Novos—and about how to describe PCCPs in labeling, implementing PCCP modifications, and postmarket surveillance considerations. FDA has a second pending guidance explaining how to implement PCCPs more broadly, not just in the AI arena, for instance to update compatible devices, manufacturing procedures, or other product elements without a new submission. (See “Predetermined Change at FDA: New Modification Strategy Applied to Growing List of Devices,” Market Pathways,September 26, 2024.)

Continue reading Pathways’ Picks here.
×



Articles from David Filmore:

Regulatory & Reimbursement

What Notified Bodies Can Say, and When They Can Say It: Structured Dialogue Debate Advances

A recent guidance update and a European Commission plan to lay down new rules for notified bodies later this year is adding more fuel to an ongoing debate over when and how notified bodies can talk to manufacturers about MDR clinical data expectations. Two notified body officials weigh in on the current state and future opportunities for “structured dialogue,” as industry urges more predictability.

Read Article